The “informational page” is on USDA/APHIS letterhead, and it states that it is funded by those agencies pursuant to a cooperative agreement with the Nebraska Department of Agriculture. Nevertheless, NCLA recently found an “informational page” nearly identical to the Factsheet published in the February 2020 edition of Nebraska Cattleman magazine announcing that RFID eartags will become mandatory, albeit through a phased approach. Her order made it clear that she believed USDA’s Factsheet and underlying policy have been fully and completely withdrawn, and she also emphasized that “ unambiguously stated that the requirements of the 2019 Factsheet will not be implemented” In her February 13 th order, Judge Freudenthal found that the case was now moot because the USDA and APHIS had responded to NCLA’s lawsuit by withdrawing the unlawful guidance “Factsheet” and removing it from the agency website. , which dismissed the lawsuit upon her concluding that the agencies had fully withdrawn their previous efforts to require livestock producers to use RFID eartags. District Judge for the District of Wyoming, to revisit the court order she recently issued in R-CALF et al. The motion seeks to block ongoing efforts to rely upon an unlawful “guidance” document to mandate the use of radio frequency identification (RFID) tracking technology on livestock. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Washington, DC (February 28, 2020) – The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan nonprofit civil rights organization, has filed a supplemental motion, asking the Court to reopen its case against the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
